| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
blogs
An E-Mail to Padmanabha Maharaja
[Note: Padmanabha Maharaja was originally initiated by Srila Prabhupada and is now a follower of Narayana Maharaja.]
Dear Padmanabha Maharaja,
Please accept my most humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada!
Thank you for your great hospitality yesterday. As to be expected, though, I have had some afterthoughts. I am glad to hear that Narayana Maharaja is really not the big bad wolf, but there are still some points.
You are preaching to new people that the ISKCON gurus are third class and that the new people should all go to Narayana Maharaja because he is a mahabhagavata. This does not come from Srila Prabhupada, and if Narayana Maharaja is as you say he is, it could not come from him either.
But you cannot tell me you are not preaching this. The results show otherwise, with all these easy initiations.
We are all servants of Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Maharaja. But there is still a difference, and I prefer to maintain that difference. My mission is to distribute the books of Srila Prabhupada and to teach according to them. The followers of Narayana Maharaja have a different program.
Srila Prabhupada said to study his Srimad Bhagavatam and his Bhagavad-gita As It Is every day. That is an instruction, but the Narayana Maharaja people do not follow it. That is their business, but they should not act to bring ISKCON disciples to their math and thus encourage them to disobey this instruction.
You say that Narayana Maharaja does not aspire to be the acharya successor to Srila Prabhupada, but that is what you are trying to accomplish by saying that everyone should take shelter of him. If that happens, the distribution of Srila Prabhupada's books will stop, and they will become dusty old volumes on someone's shelf.
The Narayana Maharaja people read Narayana Maharaja's books, and that is what they distribute. Fine with me, but that is not what Srila Prabhupada told his disciples to do.
Srila Prabhupada did not leave any instruction that I know of saying that his disciples should take shelter of Narayana Maharaja or anyone else. In fact, he repeatedly told his disciples to be respectful to the acharyas of the Gaudiya Math but not to go outside the institution of ISKCON for instruction.
I intend to obey this order and to instruct my disciples to do the same. You, on the other hand, are encouraging my disciples to disobey their guru and in so doing to disobey Srila Prabhupada.
Srila Prabhupada said that there may be many political parties all working for the same government, but that everyone should stick to his own party.
Regarding re-initiation, you say that there is scriptural justification for it. I cannot deny that, but Srila Prabhupada said that it is forbidden, and Srila Prabhupada is my authority on all matters. I do not jump over him.
And you yourself said that the raganuga instruction is already there in Krsna Book. I do not know of any instruction by Srila Prabhupada saying that we must find another mahabhagavata to explain it to us.
You have made your decision, and that is your business, but it is wrong of you to interfere in the service of those who have chosen to stay within the walls of ISKCON, as Srila Prabhupada requested.
After Sridhar Maharaja left his body, his Western followers all opened up their own maths. This is exactly what Srila Prabhupada did not want. He wanted a united ISKCON, working under the GBC, in spite of the mistakes. He did not say to find a siksa guru and work under him.
I have firm faith that no one can offer me any higher perfection than what I will attain by following these instructions of Srila Prabhupada, and I will fight any effort to interfere and tell me or my disciples to go outside of ISKCON for instruction or initiation.
You say you are still Srila Prabhupada's disciple. Then what are you doing to distribute his books?
Yours in the service of Srila Prabhupada,
Umapati Swami
© Umapati Swami, December 24, 2006
Photo: Srila Prabhupada's books at the lotus feet of Sri Sri Gaura Nitai, New Mayapur, France
The Mercy of Srimati Radharani
My dear X Mataji,
All glories to Srila Prabhupada!
Thank you for your letter. I will try to answer your questions.
The devotees who were cursed by Srimati Radharani to take birth in the material world are not fallen souls, even in this world. They are part of a pastime, like Jaya and Vijaya.
People like you and me are fallen souls. We are in this material world because we chose to be here. It is completely our own choosing, not that we were forced to come here. We come into the material world by our own choice, and we go back to the spiritual world by our own choice.
This is an important point. It is completely our fault that we are in the material world. It is not a curse by Srimati Radharani or anyone else.
You say you are envious of Radharani's relationship with Krishna. This is because you think it is a relationship of sense gratification, like romance in the material world. But it is something completely different. When the gopis kiss the lips of Krishna, they taste nectar, but it is not the nectar of sex desire. It is the nectar of Vedic knowledge.
It is this nectar that gives them the knowledge to play music, to draw, to dance, and so on. Read Srila Prabhupada's purport to Srimad Bhagavatam 2.4.24.
We also relish this nectar when we talk about Krishna, although we can relish it only to a small extent because we have other desires and we commit offenses. The gopis relish it fully because they have no other desires and they do not commit offenses.
Now besides the gopis, there are other girls called manjaris. Here is a passage from Teachings of Lord Chaitanya:
"The personal associates of Radharani are called sakhis, and Her near assistants are called manjaris. It is very difficult to express their dealings with Krsna because they have no desire to mix with Krsna or to enjoy Him personally. Rather, they are always ready to help Radharani associate with Krsna. Their affection for Krsna and Radharani is so pure that they are simply satisfied when Radha and Krsna are together. Indeed, their transcendental pleasure is in seeing Radha and Krsna united. The actual form of Radharani is just like a creeper embracing the tree of Krsna, and the damsels of Vraja, the associates of Radharani, are just like the leaves and flowers of that creeper. When a creeper embraces a tree, the leaves and flowers as well as the creeper automatically embrace it. Govinda-lilamrta (10.16) confirms that Radharani is the expansion of the pleasure potency of Krsna and is compared with a creeper, and Her associates, the damsels of Vraja, are compared to the flowers and leaves of that creeper. When Radharani and Krsna enjoy Themselves, the damsels of Vraja relish the pleasure more than Radharani Herself."
Now you can see here that the manjaris do not desire to enjoy Krishna for themselves, and yet they experience even more pleasure than Srimati Radharani. Here is the next paragraph:
"Although the associates of Radharani do not expect any personal attention from Krsna, Radharani is so pleased with them that She arranges individual meetings between Krsna and the damsels of Vraja. Indeed, Radharani tries to combine or unite Her associates with Krsna by many transcendental maneuvers, and She takes more pleasure in these meetings than in Her own meetings with Him. When Krsna sees that both Radharani and Her associates are pleased by His association, He becomes more satisfied. Such association and loving reciprocation have nothing to do with material lust, although it resembles the material union between man and woman. It is only because that similarity is there that such reciprocation is sometimes called, in transcendental language, transcendental lust. As explained in Gautamiya-tantra (Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu 1.2.285): "Lust means attachment to one's personal sense gratification. But as far as Radharani and Her associates are concerned, they did not desire personal sense gratification. They only wanted to satisfy Krsna."
So you can see that Radharani is very magnanimous and merciful.
Here is another text:
"Direct servants of Lord Krsna are Srimati Radharani or Lord Balarama and other gopis and cowherd boys. Some of the gopis and cowherd boys are assistants to the direct servants. Among these assistants are the manjaris, who help Radharani serve Krsna and who, according to Her [Radharani], experience a happiness even greater than Hers."
So do not think that Srimati Radharani is a selfish sense-gratifier, like us. She always wants to give more happiness to others that she gets for herself.
So your thinking has a contradiction. You want to take the position of Srimati Radharani, but do you want others to have more happiness than you? Actually, you want just the opposite. You want it all for yourself.
This is the difference between spiritual happiness and material happiness. In the material world we want happiness even if we have to get it by taking it away from others. In the spiritual world, we want to make others happier than ourselves.
Now let us turn to Lord Chaitanya. He is Krishna experiencing the happiness of Radharani, but He never takes the position of Radharani although he could. Sri Caitanya Caritamrta does not speak of Lord Caitanya dancing with Krsna and kissing Krsna. He experienced the highest bliss by taking the position of a servant.
Lord Caitanya lived the life that we are being taught to live in Krsna Consciousness, although he could have done anything he wanted.
Always remember that the nectar the gopis and Srimati Radharani taste by kissing Krishna is the nectar of Vedic knowledge, which is already available to us. If you want to know the pleasure of the relationship between Radha and Krishna, then you must worship that relationship and not try to take Radharani's place. It is only by the mercy of Srimati Radharani that we can worship Krishna at all.
Do not aspire to be the supreme female or the supreme anything. That is Mayavadi philosophy, and it is repugnant to a devotee. Aspire to be the servant of the servant. See yourself as lower than the straw in the street. This is Lord Chaitanya's instruction, and it is what He Himself did.
I hope this helps. If you need more clarification, let me know.
Yours in the service of Srila Prabhupada,
Umapati Swami
© Umapati Swami, December 16, 2006
On line Again
Sorry for the long absence. I am blogging again. I'll be posting a few things in the next couple of days.
Your servant,
Umapati Swami
Bhakti Svarupa Damodara Maharaja
I have just learned that Sriman Bhakti Svarupa Damodara Maharaja has left this world. He was my Godbrother and friend, and it is hard to imagine my life without him, even though we rarely came together.
I met him in 1973 when he was a student in Southern California. Srila Prabhupada was in Los Angeles at the time, and he would call for Svarupa Damodara dasa brahmacari at the beginning of Srimad Bhagavatam class almost every day. "Where is our scientist?" Srila Prabhupada would ask.
We would meet every few years. And of course, it was always a pleasure to hear him sing at the Mayapur Festival. I would look forward to meeting him again and seeing the cheerful face and bright smile. I never saw him in any other mood.
Well I know where he has gone. I can only hope he will put in a good word for me.
© Umapati Swami
October 6, 2006
Humans Hardwired for Religion
I read an interesting blog today, called "Humans Hardwired for Religion":
http://www.soulcast.com/
post/show/23127/Humans-%27
hardwired-for-religion%27
The blog states that the tendency toward religion is an essential part of human psychology, inherent in the human brain, and that no amount of evolutionary theory or so-called rational thought will change this.
If we turn to Bhagavad-gita, however, we can take this a step further and find out why it is so.
"Having obtained real knowledge from a self-realized soul, you will never fall again into such illusion, for by this knowledge you will see that all living beings are but part of the Supreme, or, in other words, that they are Mine."
The darwinist, of course, will argue that this is only a statement and cannot be borne out by logic, but there is more to it.
Bhagavad-gita begins by separating the living being, or soul, from the body he inhabits.
"Those who are seers of the truth have concluded that of the nonexistent [the material body] there is no endurance and of the eternal [the soul] there is no change. This they have concluded by studying the nature of both."
I am not going to go into all the logical and observational proofs of the difference between the soul and the body here, as it has been dealt with extensively in Bhagavad-gita, although I will explain that the soul is that which does not change in this constantly changing body and leaves the body at death.
We are essentially spiritual beings trapped for the moment in material bodies, and therefore the tendency toward spirituality goes even deeper than the brain.
The essential spiritual nature of the living being is dealt with logically and rationally in Bhagavad-gita, and this same spiritual nature is what is being discussed in the "Hardwired "blog.
I don't leave room for comments on my blog because I do not have the time to deal with them, but if anyone would like more elaboration, he or she can write to me at swami@umapati.net
Umapati Swami
© September 22, 2006
Happy Radhastami!
"Today we will only fast till noon because Srimati Radharani is so kind that she does not want us to be hungry."—Srila Prabhupada, Radhastami 1966
